I was considering proposing to remove it as well. Jeff
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 11:25 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 13:37 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 21:17 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > > Which imap implementation are you using? "imap4rev1" is newer but > > > less > > > battle hardened and thus buggier than the "imap" one. I never get > > > crashes with it (where 'never' is defined as not enough to notice or > > > recall), although I only use it for one mostly idle account (Novell > > > mail ...). > > > > I use IMAP on my office installation of Evo 2.3.3 and IMAP4rev1 on my > > home installation of Evo 2.2, both against the same (busy) account (but > > not simultaneously). The IMAP4rev1 version freezes and has to be > > forceably shut down several times a day. The other one not so much, or > > not at all -- I don't remember. The IMAP server is Cyrus on RedHat 9. > > > > I don't recall seeing warnings about the IMAP4rev1 implementation. I'll > > be switching to IMAP as soon as I get home tonight ... > > I wonder if we should remove it from the default build (except removing > something that is there is always fraught with danger), or at least add > a comment about it. Having started on another imap backend I dont > really want to maintain 3 ... > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
