ok guys, I read all the comments and I still think that it's a good idea. If only for the fact the you don't have to harrass the sender when his mail settings are not 'correct', automatic conversion would work wonders for usability and interoperability (and migration!)
whether a filter, plugin, or something entirely internal to evolution is used is not really important, that should be an implementation detail :-) ________________________________ Ferry Huberts Linux Rocks! ________________________________ Brady's First Law of Problem Solving: When confronted by a difficult problem, you can solve it more easily by reducing it to the question: "How would the Lone Ranger have handled this?" > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Not Zed > Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 07:35 > To: Ow Mun Heng > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Evolution] [Feature Request] tnef integration > > On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 19:21 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 19:01 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > > On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 18:46 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > > > > > > Ok, why not integrate tnef conversion into Evolution??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just wondering, Is there one tnef that actually > integrates at the > > > > MTA level? > > > It doesn't. Only that I think if there's a way to put it > there, those > > pesky attachments can come in cleaned up to users. (rather > than force > > users to install plugins etc) > > Ahah, I see. Good question. Well that plugin could be > converted to do something like that as a filter. Would be > nice if it could happen before then though, although it would > break digital signatures (if they're even supported in tnef). > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
