On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 01:48 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > spam filtering perhaps? I don't use spam filtering because of the horrid > slowness, but some people do :) > > Jeff
Thank you, Jeff. That was indeed the problem. == Ben > > On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 12:57 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > Oh right, maybe it has something to do with indexing then. > > > > pop download is very fast for me. > > > > On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 23:14 -0500, Ben Miller wrote: > > > On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 11:55 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 19:36 -0500, Ben Miller wrote: > > > > > I'm sorry if this has been asked before, but I couldn't find mention > > > > > of > > > > > it in the archives. When checking any of my POP accounts, Evolution > > > > > takes a very long time to download mail, even if it's only two of > > > > > three > > > > > > > > You're probably using 'keep on server' right? And the server doesn't > > > > support UIDL. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help. Actually, I'm not. I tell the server to download > > > everything. > > > > > > == Ben > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > evolution maillist - [email protected] > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
