On 12 Apr 2001 10:48:33 +0930, Not Zed wrote: > i'm cc'ing this to rms too, just for background. > > You must be a laywer to have such strong and obviously correct views on > the matter. Perhaps it would be better to send this to some official or accredited lawyers for all organizations involved, who might be better qualified and trained in the points of the relevant laws, to comment on. It is a discussion of what is legally permissable under the terms of 2 different licenses, and how they interact, after all. _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support Todd Kaehler
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support Austin Gonyou
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support Not Zed
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support Matthew Vanecek
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support Ilya Konstantinov
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support Not Zed
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support Matthew Vanecek
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support Jeffrey Stedfast
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support - legal issues Michael Leone
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support Not Zed
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support Michael Leone
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support Jason Wojciechowski
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support Todd Kaehler
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support hayward
- [Evolution] LDAP Support Juan Alonso Hernández
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP Support Not Zed
- [Evolution] LDAP support David Frager
- Re: [Evolution] LDAP support Chris Toshok