> > > The new package should be linked with the newer db library, so the
> > > contacts should be visible again...
> >
> > I disagree with this - or we have different meanings to "newer".
> > [snip]
> > >From this evidence Evo 0.10 is using DB 1.85, which cannot read 2.x
> > version files.
>
> I see the same:
>
> $ file addressbook.db
> addressbook.db: Berkeley DB 2.X Hash/Little Endian (Version 5, Logical
> sequence number: file - 0, offset - 0, Bucket Size 4096, Overflow Point
> 3, Last Freed 0, Max Bucket 5, High Mask 0x7, Low Mask 0x3, Fill Factor
> 0, Number of Keys 65)
Wierd. I see this ..
[turgon@minas-aran Contacts]$ file addressbook.db
addressbook.db: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 5, native byte-order)
Wonder why I don't see the level of detail the rest of you see, from that
"file" command?
> I don't understand what version of db Evo is actually using at runtime,
> since the only db package on my system seems to be db3-3.1.17-4.6x, and
> when I installed from RC no other db package was pulled over.
I have db2-2.7.7-1mdk, and db3-3.1.17-4.6x RPMs installed.
Doing a db_dump -p addressbook.db (thank you, Fernando, for that! :-)
[turgon@minas-aran Contacts]$ db_dump -p addressbook.db
format=print
type=hash
db_pagesize=4096
HEADER=END
PAS-DB-VERSION\00
0.1\00
And I see my entries.
Currently, I'm running evolution-0.10-ximian.1.
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
