Hi!
(I'm posting this to the list, 'cause I forgot to post it there, sorry)
Am 21 May 2001 11:10:07 -0400 schrieb Jean-Philippe Proulx:
> But I think we have to include the option and ask the user...
> Because for me, ~/evolution is really not practises.
Here my question is: why isn't it practical for you? what is wrong with
~/evolution? and why is ~/.evolution better?
Okay, an option on the commandline would give the chance to use it or
not... but I'm not seeing why ~/.evolution is better...
>
> On 21 May 2001 14:59:42 +0200, Manuel Borchers wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Am 20 May 2001 22:17:31 -0400 schrieb Jean-Philippe Proulx:
> > > why we don't set the config directory to [~/.evolution] and not the
> > > !!!
> > > ~/evolution.
> > > Or just include and option in the command line?
Ciao,
Manuel
--
('> http://www.matronix.de <`)
//\ http://www.e-online.de/public/borchers /\\
V_/_ "Oszillatoren schwingen nie, Verst�rker immer!" _\_V
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
