On 05 Jul 2001 23:03:10 -0700, Miles Lane wrote:
> On 05 Jul 2001 12:25:54 -0400
> Jeffrey Stedfast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Expunge only expunges a single folder while Empty Trash emptie all of
> > the trash folders (and since the trash folders are vfolders of all of
> > your real folders, it expunges all of your folders).
>
> Hmm. I think that the UI should probably be modified to make
> these facts clear to the user. So, "Expunge" should be "Expunge Folder"
> and "Empty Trash" should be "Empty Trash Folders".
I suppose...
>
> I am away from my test machine for a few days, so I'll ask some
> questions here:
>
> 1. Doesn't "Expunge" also empty the current folder's deleted
> messages from the Trash folder? Perhaps this should not happen,
> since the UI doesn't reflect that.
Yes, because a vFolder doesn't have it's own copy of the message, it
peeks into the original folder for the actual message. So when you
expunge Inbox (for example), all the deleted messages in Inbox will be
removed thus the vTrash folder will no longer be able to see them.
Does that make sense?
>
> 2. You mention trash vfolders. I thought there was only one
> Trash vfolder that was shared by all folders. Is the "Trash"
> folder really some sort of merged view of multiple trash vfolders?
There is a vTrash folder for each store, ie: 1 for the Local store and 1
for each IMAP store.
>
> 3. I would assume that no matter what folder I am in, if I delete
> a message, that message shows up in the "Trash" vfolder. Is this
> correct?
Yes, this would be correct.
Jeff
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
