Here's a bunch of (probably) stupid questions. Any particular reason it was branched? Just curious since I though the "normal" way was to remain in one branch until 1.0 then branch new development.
So, to continue my ways of having the latest stuff from CVS, should I change the GAL and Evolution branches also? How is gtkhtml2 related to all this? On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 06:52, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 05:37, Dan Hensley wrote: > A few days ago I updated the Evolution 1 branch from CVS, and it's > looking for gtkhtml 1.0. However, gtkhtml hasn't updated for a few > days, and it's still at 0.16.1. Is it just that anoncvs hasn't caught > up yet, or is there some disconnect? > gtkhtml has also been branched. Get the gtkhtml-1-0-branch from CVS cheers -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.gnome-db.org/ - http://www.ximian.com/ _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- TTFN, Lonnie Borntreger ------ ------ ------ Our mission is to authoritatively promote timely methods of empowerment so that we may endeavor to collaboratively supply inexpensive opportunities to exceed customer expectations _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution