hey dan. sorry for my last email. i was so angry because i really tried this in mozilla-mail, in netscape-messenger and in outlook. i couldn't just eat the fact that the cid is wrong anyway.
thanks for the info. i'll make it better from now on. :) On Sat, 2001-12-01 at 18:48, Dan Winship wrote: > On Sat, 2001-12-01 at 12:30, Manuel Streuhofer wrote: > > another question..... > > > > where exactly is the problem with the content-id? > > First, it needs a "@" in it, second, you need <>s around it in the > Content-ID header. (so, '<img src="cid:something@something";>' and > 'Content-Id: <something@something>') > > > where is the content-id in my email wrong if any other > > mailclient than evolution can parse it correctly? > > "any" other mailclient? Have you tried *all* of them? > > Standards exist for a reason. If you're not going to stick to them, you > can't expect things to work reliably across a wide range of > implementations. > > -- Dan > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- best regards, Manuel Streuhofer
msg04424/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
