On 22 May 2002, Dan Winship wrote: > I thought we'd agreed that: > > 1. The old way was broken and didn't do what some people wanted, > BUT > 2. The new way doesn't do what *anyone* wants (except for people > who were happy with the old way too). > > and so it made sense to revert back to the full message browser?
It does so, if you read what you have written: 1) _some_ people have issues with the old way. 2) _all_ people have issues with the new way. Which one is the worst? Removing code that is currently doing something usefull at least for some is a VERY bad strategy, at least until someone writes a better replacement, -- Martin-�ric Racine, Helsinki, Finland. http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/ +358 41 474 0289 _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
