This is a completely separate issue, one is doing syntax highlighting and the other is trying to be smart on arbitrary text that someone else wrote.
Jeff On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 13:30, Nils O. Sel�sdal wrote: > On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 03:05, Not Zed wrote: > > > So why bother about any of the colouring stuff? It all gets dropped as > > soon as you send it anyway. Like, who really cares what it looks like > > on the screen, just set the quote colour to the same as the text colour > > and be done with it? It seems to be an awful lot of niggling over > > something which doesn't even mean anything. > I find it great having color on things you edit, makes it easier to > read. I dont think I'd be wery happy if I e.g.edited some source code in > vim, removed a quote " around a string, and vim didnt fix the color for > the rest of the source when I put it back again.. > > -- > Nils Olav Sel�sdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > System Developer, UtelSystems a/s > w w w . u t e l s y s t e m s . c o m > > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
