On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 16:58, Martin-�ric Racine wrote: > What Evolution subcomponents would need to be accessed to code such a module? > In this country (and a few neighboring ones), legally-binding digital signatures > are already enforced by law, only the technology to implement them is missing > (except for Windows, of course...).
Depends on how its done. If we do something like the pgp code, which might work in some cases, then we just need a command that we can execute that can do the various s/mime operations. "openssl" part of the OpenSSL package has some support for s/mime, and it coudl be used. Then you just need a wrapper in camel to execute it properly. We already have a class that should be subclassed for this, etc (the class can sign/verify/encrypt/descrypt data basically - no management operations). To do it 'fully', we'd need a c ssl library (thread safe as well), that can sit behind the same interfaces (e.g. see camel-multipart-signed for an object that uses the gpg interfaces we have for pgp mail). > On 14 Jul 2002, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > You can't. > > Jeff > > > > On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 03:41, Jean-Noel Colin wrote: > > > I would like to know if (and how) it is possible to digitally sign > > > emails using certificates, not PGP or GPG? > > -- > Martin-�ric Racine, Espoo, Finland. > http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/ > +358 41 474 0289 > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
