> > > 1.1.x defaults to the X-Evolution-Source first, and then checks.
> I am interested to know what "the old way" is? If you would, explain a > scenario where the 1.1.x way behaves in an undesirable manner? AFAIK: in 1.0, first are checked the 'To:' and 'Cc:' fields, then the 'X-Evo-Source'. Different email addresses may point to the same physical mailbox and be still differentiated as long as you have an account without mailbox defined on it. So, I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] as my main address, but an alias [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my project: this just redirects to the main mailbox. I would like to reply to these messages with my [EMAIL PROTECTED] account (including custom signature and other details), which I created without an actual POP mailbox, since there is not. 1.0 does this just fine because it looks to the 'To:' header. I believe 1.1 won't because the 'X-Evo-Source' is linked to the main '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. In fact "virtual" accounts become half useless and lose much of their power. Ofcourse, I may just have misunderstood the change, but there was quite a discussion in the previous weeks, see http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution/2002-July/020359.html (the thread is acutally split between July and August). -- Alessio F. Bragadini [EMAIL PROTECTED] APL Financial Services http://village.albourne.com Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-22-755750 "It is more complicated than you think" -- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925 _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
