On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 11:24, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 11:15, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 11:08, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > > > > > Yes, IMAP in 1.2 may be considerably faster for Courier IMAPd. > > > > > > > > it's faster for presumably every server *except* uw.imapd. > > > > > > Yeah, but still, do we have any idea why uw.imapd would be slower? > > > > uw.imapd re-parses the mbox (it uses mbox as the backend) everytime it > > does anything with the folder. That's just plain slow (and inefficient > > obviously). > > Understood. But then, why would uw.imapd be faster with Evolution > 1.0.x?
probably because it doesn't parse the headers when we requested the full header block in 1.0.8, but since we ask for all headers *except* Received, apparently it stumbles quite a bit more than it did for 1.0.8's query. that's just a guess. Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
