On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 17:23, Not Zed wrote: 
> I've dont plenty of testing with disconnecting, and it works fine.  It
> takes a while and eventually times out.  If i reconnect the network, it
> just keeps going again.

NoZed, we must be doing something different.  Here's the first thing I
tried:  

- connect modem (click modemlights applet)
- start evolution
- wait for the INBOX to show up
- disconnect modem (click the modemlights applet)
- in evolution, click the connect button (evolution lower left button)  
- click cancel in the evolution popup window 
- connect modem (click the modemlights applet)

At this point, evolution hangs, meaning that at the bottom, it displays
"Scanning folders in "IMAP..."  and messages do not show up in the
preview window when I click on them.  I left it undisturbed for 10
minutes and it remained frozen in that state.  I don't know, maybe it's
a thread contention but the bottom line is that I can't read email until
evolution is killev'ed and restarted.  As far as I know, this is
reasonably close to what happens when my modem connection goes down on
its own.  There are a lot of other ways I can get to this state.

Could you try this experiment?  Jeff Stedfast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) says
that UW IMAP is bad juju.  If you don't get the same hang that I do, do
you think it's because of the type of IMAP server UW has?

Scott

> > Just to make sure we're talking about the same thing, what's the number
> > for the open bug on PPP disconnects causing an IMAP hang?
> 
>  ??
> 
> IMAP and POP are separate.
> 
> There might be some threading contention where a thread is 'busy'
> waiting for a timeout, but it isn't hanging.
> 
> 
> > Scott
> > 
> > On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 14:22, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > they are 1) unrelated and 2) already reported.
> > > 
> > > Jeff
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 17:16, Scott Otterson wrote:
> > > > Why not?  It's clear that there's a bug in evolution and that it's not a
> > > > fundamental flaw with Linux.
> > > > 
> > > > Now, if the stop button bug and the PPP-disconnect-hang bug are
> > > > manifestations of the same problem, then I agree that it doesn't make
> > > > sense to file a new one -- that is, if there is a non-closed stop button
> > > > bug and if it is known that these are really the same problem.  
> > > > 
> > > > Are both these things true?
> > > > 
> > > > Scott
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 13:33, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > > > please do not submit new bug reports, thanks.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Jeff
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 16:15, Scott Otterson wrote:
> > > > > > Yes, Ettore, you're right about the stop button not working -- and
> > > > > > there's at least one bug on it but it was closed as fixed even though it
> > > > > > wasn't.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Is the stop button problem also causing the PPP-disconnect-induced
> > > > > > hangs?  Or should I file a separate bug?  Anyway, you're right that this
> > > > > > isn't a problem with Linux: Mozilla on Linux handles PPP disconnects
> > > > > > just fine.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Scott
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 11:38, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 13:12, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On reading your response, my first thought was, "Boy, linux must be
> > > > > > > > > lame," because on Windows, nothing hangs when you lose your PPP -- 
>not
> > > > > > > > > outlook, not mozilla, not anything as far as I know.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > wonderful about those win32 apis for finding out when the connection
> > > > > > > > goes down. Not available on linux.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Having the Stop button working properly in all cases in the mailer would
> > > > > > > be a good starting point though.  ;-)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > It is true that we have a bug there, and it can be fixed, and there is
> > > > > > > no reason to blame Linux for it.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > > Ettore Perazzoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > Jeffrey Stedfast
> > > > > Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]  - www.ximian.com
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > > -- 
> > > Jeffrey Stedfast
> > > Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]  - www.ximian.com
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution





-- 



Scott Otterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


_______________________________________________
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Reply via email to