yep, your observation would be correct. Jeff
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:43, Bill Hartwell wrote: > If I understand what you were saying earlier, email clients (like Kmail) > that make the signature a part of the body of the message, rather than a > separate attachment, do not understand the signatures that Evolution > sends? > > I just did a personal test to see if the reverse is true as well - that > Evolution does not understand a signature if it is included in the body > of the message, rather than being a separate attachment. It appears that > that is the case, since the message opened in my inbox as you see here, > without the indication that it was a signed message. The same happened > when I sent myself an encrypted message. It appeared in my inbox > encrypted, rather than being transparently decrypted. To verify the > signature, or to decrypt the message, I had to copy it and send it to > gpg manually. > > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 13:25, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > I don't understand what you're asking. > > > > Jeff > > > > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:18, Bill Hartwell wrote: > > > I thought about what JF had said, and did a quick test of my own. I sent > > > a test message from another account, using Kmail, to this account, which > > > uses Evolution. The results are below. > > > > > > Am I to take it that this is due to the signature being inlined, rather > > > than attached? > > > > > > -----Forwarded Message----- > > > > > > From: Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Test Message > > > Date: 02 Jan 2003 09:08:06 -0700 > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > Test Message > > > - -- > > > All private email sent with PGP encryption. Email for key. > > > Homepage: http://www.macmanusnet.net/ > > > Freedom in our lifetime: http://www.freestateproject.org > > > Enforce the Bill of Rights: > > > http://www.lneilsmith.com/bor_enforcement.html > > > A July 1993 U.S. Department of Justice study found that "boys who own > > > legal firearms ... have much lower rates of delinquency and drug use > > > [than those who obtained them illegally] and are even slightly less > > > delinquent than nonowners of guns." It concluded that, "for legal > > > gunowners, socialization appears to take place in the family; for > > > illegal gunowners, it appears to take place 'on the street' ". - U.S. > > > Department of Justice > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > > > > > iD8DBQE+FGPoAEWCS/G3bx4RAk8OAJ9eJcRYTSumWRKiqMpwY7bMT0WzIQCdE5ym > > > K/CBCqS/JyrWdStsQ7R515E= > > > =3DMW > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
