On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:12, Jim Frost wrote: > I note that I looked into spamassassin, which seems to be the preferred > technique using an external filter, and I really dislike its rule-based > system. Way too many false positives, and a lot of work to set up and > maintain too. Spam filtering would be a great integrated feature and > doesn't look like it'd be a lot of work to implement.
SpamAssassin + fetchmail + procmail + Evolution is great. One of the big mistakes people make when using spam filtering is to consider it a binary filter: spam or not spam. I have my spam sorted in two categories: marginal and high. I only weekly check my marginal folder, if at all. The high folder do not check at all. The rare false positives you talk about end up in the marginal folder. -Arthur _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
