On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 14:21, Kris Stark wrote: > More interestingly even - why did that one message cause a failure of > the entire queue? (Obvious, as it is a queue...) However, this should > have some sort of a system in place to allow recovery from errors such > as this... > > Kris > > On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 16:11, Bill Hartwell wrote: > > Now the question comes of...how did Evolution queue a message with no > > recipients? For that matter, how did it lose the recipients when it was > > nothing more than a reply to a message on the list, which should have > > automatically brought the addresses over from the message it was a reply > > to?
I thought of that, but I think for that to work might require a different format for storing messages. Actually, that is a good question...does Evolution use mbox or mdir format? And would one allow for some code that would skip over bad messages while the other doesn't, or does it really matter? I haven't seen a single email client yet that can recover from this error - but generally the error message will say something about the address blocks being empty, rather than simply relaying the error message it gets from the server. -- Bill Hartwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MacManus Enterprises
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
