They both use the same SSL stream code -the SMTP/IMAP/etc code is completely ignorant that it is even using an ssl stream at all, in fact.
Jeff On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 21:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [This is a resend that didn't seem to make it to the list somehow...even > though I have sendmail logs saying that it was delivered???] > > I'm still having no luck with Evolution and SMTP+SSL. (see my earlier email > on the similar subject for software versions etc). > > Jeff had suggested that it may be a problem with mozilla nss ssl. I've > currently got mozilla-nss-1.2.1-0_rh8 (from mozilla.org) installed. > > I've tried SMTP+SSL with mozilla-mail and it doesn't even initiate an > SSL "CLIENT HELLO". Evolution will at least initiate the SSL handshake. > > Does Evo use a different means of SSL handshake for IMAP+SSL and SMTP+SSL? > It's just that I have IMAP+SSL working correctly but SMTP+SSL from Evo doesn't > work. If Evo uses the same calls to initiate the SSL connection and I have > IMAP+SSL working then I don't see how the bug could be in the mozilla-nss > libs? > > Now I'm getting desparate - <oh>don't even get me started on my thoughts of the > stability of RedHat 8.0... come back 7.3 - all is forgiven >;-> </ot> > > -- > mike\n. > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
