On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 10:16, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:04, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> > fre, 2003-01-10 kl. 15:50 skrev Thomas J. Baker:
> > 
> > > Does anyone have ldaps working?
> > 
> > Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't (Openldap 2.1.10/Berkeley
> > 4.1.24 backend). I can't depend on it, and have to permanently disable
> > it, since I'm too bad-tempered to put up with the sporadic barfs.. Just
> > as I have to with Evo with WU-IMAP snapshot. Also applies to TLS, on
> > these two.
> > 
> > Whereas Evo smtp TLS and CRAM-MD5 always works.
> 
> that's because OpenLDAP libs use OpenSSL and libsasl, whereas evo-mail
> uses Mozilla's NSS for SSL and my own custom SASL library that I
> designed while drunk and implemented in a day or 2
> </shameless plug>
> 
> :-)

you may, of course, be right :)  At least about the ssl cruft.. 
although my attempts at setting up sasl for openldap here have met with
extremely poor results (i was also drunk at the time too.  hm).

toshok


_______________________________________________
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Reply via email to