On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 22:59, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
> That makes perfectly good sense. Evolution is not broken in this
> regard. Now is there any chance of fixing the list software so that it
> defaults to "Reply to List" and we don't have the twin problems of
> sometimes forgetting and only replying to sender, and others who don't
> feel like digging into menus hitting "Reply to All" instead. The first
> behavior defeats the sharing purpose of the list, and the second is
> inefficient, wasteful, and annoying.
Setting Reply-To: headers on lists is just stupid as well as being plain
wrong. Please don't do it. Its just pandering to those that can't
handle Reply-to-list in the MUA.
Nigel.
[Do I really want to start this religious war again... Can't we talk
about something non-contentious like the superiority of xemacs over
emacs over vi]
--
[ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
