Christine, Any new news on this? -Brian
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 11:27, Christine McLellan wrote: > Brian - Do you know the bug number? I did a quick search and was not > able to locate it. Or how you described the problem? Thanks, > -Christine > > On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 11:35, Brian Rectanus wrote: > > I cannot reproduce the new message count doubling anymore (with > > evolution/connector 1.2.1 on Debian woody). But, evolution still does > > not download new mail to Inbox if I am currently viewing the Inbox. If > > I leave the Inbox and come back, then the messages are downloaded. This > > is *very* annoying. Because of this, mail alerts and filters are not > > applied until I get out, then back into the Inbox. > > > > Ximian, any word on a fix for this? I submitted a bug report, but it is > > hidden from public eyes. > > > > -Brian > > > > On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 03:33, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > Oops, I was a bit hasty it seems, the Inbox refresh works *sometimes* > > > now. 1.2.1 makes the problem harder to reproduce, but it's certainly > > > still there :( > > > > > > On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 12:25, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > > I've just upgraded to Evo 1.2.1 (RH7.3 via Red Carpet) and the inbox > > > > refresh works just fine for me. Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 18:47, Brian Rectanus wrote: > > > > > Yep, all my filter rules are server side - so I can use different > > > > > machines and still keep the same filter set instead of manually syncing > > > > > them. This affects more than just the inbox, however, it affects > > > > > incoming mail to all folders. > > > > > > > > > > It would be very nice if this was implemented in evolution/connector, > > > > > BTW :) If this and some type of message archiving were done I could > > > > > completely get rid of outlook (Exchange is an unfortunate work > > > > > requirement). > > > > > > > > > > -Brian > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 18:14, Christine McLellan wrote: > > > > > > Brian - By any chance do you have any Exchange server side rules > > > > > > (previously created with Outlook) set up on that account that moves or > > > > > > somehow manipulates the messages coming into or going out of the > > > > > > Inbox? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 15:45, Brian Rectanus wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > I am using evolution and connector (and all other deps for those two) > > > > > > > rpms. I wanted to see if any one else has this issue before filing a > > > > > > > bug... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + Evolution 1.2 w/connector against exchange server > > > > > > > + Select Inbox and mark any new messages as read (remain in Inbox) > > > > > > > + Send another message to the account (from another mailer, etc) > > > > > > > + When evolution checks for new messages the next time or if you > > > > > > > hit S/R, the new message count goes up for Inbox, but the message > > > > > > > is not displayed in the list. > > > > > > > + Setting the get new messages to N minutes or turning it > > > > > > > off seems to have no effect as clicking S/R manually does > > > > > > > the same thing. > > > > > > > + Moving out of Inbox and back then shows the message in the list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also I am not getting consistent result on these issues... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + Occasionally, marking new messages as read will not update the > > > > > > > new message count until you hit S/R or the next auto get new > > > > > > > messages from server is reached. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + Occasionally, a folder will show a new message count, and when > > > > > > > displaying that folder, the new message count doubles. Marking > > > > > > > the new messages as read halves the new message count. Then > > > > > > > doing a S/R clears the new message count. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone duplicate any of these? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Brian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part