On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 14:42, Not Zed wrote: > > In-Reply-To: Message from Bob Apthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> of "Mon, 13 Jan >2003 15:36:24 CST." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > I've asked the author of the offending message what mailer he used, I'll > > report back when I get an answer. > > Its not that easy, we take the first <> part of in-reply-to, which is > normally the right thing, but with some mailers it isn't. It isn't > possible to tell from code ...
do {
if nth <...> part does match an existing Message-Id
put it in this messages thread
while (no more <...> parts in header);
guenther: Thanks for the tip, but I don't think I'd want threading by
Subject back, except perhaps as a form of semi-manual thread management.
--- WISHLIST ITEM ---
2 new commands:
- break thread (look at this thread, for instance) at current msg
- thread this msg by subject
---------------------
(Of these, the first is probably of more use, since I often do not see
broken messages at all. OTOH, the 2nd command would be cool to have as
an action on filters: for these mailers|authors, thread by Subject).
cheers
-- vbi
--
pub 1024D/92082481 2002-02-22 Adrian von Bidder
Key fingerprint = EFE3 96F4 18F5 8D65 8494 28FC 1438 5168 9208 2481
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
