> Quoting Tang, Changqing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: RE: RFCv2: SRC API > > > > > +When job j1 needs to transmit to job j2 on remote node n for > > > the first time: > > > +1. Test: does job j1 have an existing connection to some job > > > on node n? > > > + - If no: > > > + j1 creates an SRC QP qp1 (send QP) > > > + qp1 is only used to post send WRs > > > + j2 creates an SRC QP qp2 > > > + qp2 is part of SRC domain > > > + qp2 is only used to do transport checks: > > > + neither send nor receive WRs > > > are posted on qp2 > > > + j1 and j2 create a connection between qp1 and qp2 > > > + - If yes: > > > + let qp1 be the QP which belongs to j1 and is connected > > > + to some qp on node n > > > + > > > +2. j1 gets SRQ number from j2 > > > +3. j1 can now use QP qp2 from step 1 > > > + and SRQ number from step 3 to send data to j2 > > > + > > > +Cleanup: > > > +When job j1 does not need to communicate to any jobs on node n, it > > > +disconnects qp1 from qp2, and asks j2 to destroy qp2. > > OK, I was wrong before, here is my question. > > if remote node n has j2, j3, and j4, and j2 is the job to create qp2 and > make connection with qp1 in j1. > if j2 is done before j3 and j4, then we can not let j2 to destroy qp2, > because j3 and j4 are still communicating with > j1. Since j2 owns qp2, j2 need to be the last job to cleanup. > > Am I right ?
Correct. Is this clear from the text, or is some kind of additional clarification necessary? -- MST _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
