On 10/24/07, Johann George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for your feedback. We can certainly expand, shorten and change > sessions around to maximize benefit for the attendees. >
OK, so lets do it! In short, the agenda as it is now, has a great bias to "updates and reporting" && windowz-staff && iwarp-staff vs Linux-infiniband-developers-that-get-together-to-discuss-shout-laugh-brain-storm-think-together-suggest-designs-etc with this agenda and your polite "NO" saying on everything I suggested, at hand, I don't see how to make progress. Taking a constructive direction, I suggest the following: put everything which is not stricly related to Linux-infiniband-developers (dapl / iwarp / windowz / logo program / etc) in one track, and let the developers decide what's in their track. As for the updates, start two hours earlier and make all the updates to take place on that time slot. BTW - getting feedback from commercial MPIs as the Intel and HP ones, is at least important as getting update/feedback from MVAPICH and OMPI. I vote for a 45 minutes session as Jeff suggested with all MPIs. If it does not work for you to start earlier with two hours of updates etc as I have suggested here, allocate two sessions for the Linux-IB-developers, Thursday 6PM-8PM and Friday 8AM-10AM Seriously, thanks much for the feedback. If the majority feel we > should move some sessions, we'll do our best to accommodate people's > schedules. So far there are two votes (Jeff and myself) to the direction I have suggested and one (yours) to the agenda you have posted, 2:1 is a strict majority. Based on your reply I would be starting to collect votes for my suggestion. Or.
_______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg