On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:04:39PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > > > I guess you mean just implement XRC without allowing multiple > > > processes to share an XRC domain? That actually seems like a sensible > > > thing to implement as well... > > > > This is part of the current XRC implementation -- just give -1 as the fd > value > > in ibv_open_xrc_domain(). > > I *think* Gleb's point was that the XRC implementation could be much > simpler if this were the *only* case supported -- you wouldn't need > all the complexity of kernel receive QPs etc I guess. Gleb, is that > what you meant? Yes that exactly what I meant. Just to clarify my position on XRC API. I am not against it (even if I think that usefulness of sharing QPs between processes is overestimated why should I be right?), I just want to be sure that it will not be changed in a couple of month after release of OFED 1.3 because kernel people will not except it into the kernel as is.
-- Gleb. _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg