On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 15:11 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: > Eli Cohen wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 10:17 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > > The problem with ttcpv was that it stopped sending packets since it was > > waiting for freeing the memory. The system did not hang, just the > > application (ttcpv) stopped sending. Other applications could continue > > working over the ipoib interface. > > What's ttcpv, doing web-search I only find ttcp, so I would be happy to > get pointer plus what param you were using to see the problem. It's a variant of ttcp we're using here in our regression. Dotan can you send a pointer? > > >> Also, I see that you have added a call to netif_stop_queue(), is this to > >> solve another problem? > > > This was just a whole that I found in code review - when I post a zero > > length packet, I still want this to affect the net queue control. > > Why posting a zero len packet is related to the net queue control logic? > I was thinking it has to do with releasing "unsignaled SKBs"
Yes but if I have no more room in the tx ring I would like to stop the queue even here. > > Or > _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg