On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 03:00 +0300, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 04:55 Thu 15 May , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > I haven't seen any email yet to Vlad requesting it to be pulled into > > OFED 1.3 so I assume that is pending. > > I noticed that this was pulled without request.
Interesting; I missed that. > > Also, the release notes would need some minor updating now (renumbering > > and perhaps mention of additional bug fixes). > > > > > I think Hal was asking about OpenSM version bumping > > > and tarball release for 1.3.x. > > > > If this is not done, then how is this identified as different from > > 3.1.10 ? > > 1) by OFED version, OpenSM version used to be sufficient. > 2) by git version suffix (but not sure it appears > when OpenSM is compiled from SRPM). Me neither. > > We're back to which OFED did the OpenSM come from and I thought > > the agreed direction was to get away from this as much as possible with > > tarballs. > > Correct, and this is how this will work with next major release. Unlike > this OFED-1.3.1 is *bug fix* release, which should mean that only > limited number of critical fixes should enter there. > > We probably will generate new tarball at end of 1.3.x cycle (since there > are couple of changes already), but I will try to limit number of such > releases by only one - don't see a dig value to put version bump commit > on every single change. I wasn't proposing this for every single change but rather one coordinated with 1.3.1. -- Hal > Sasha > _______________________________________________ > ewg mailing list > ewg@lists.openfabrics.org > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg