On 08:53 Mon 29 Sep , John Russo wrote: > The concern is that use of basic utilities and diagnostic tools should > not require opensm to be installed.
Not opensm, opensm-libs. As far as I remember the concern was about some specific third parties (non-OFA) using "non-public" libraries. > Given the previous discussion it > would have seemed that only opensm was going to use the non-public > libraries. We are unclear on what the permitted scope of use of these > libraries are. And the discussion was about stable and non-stable library APIs, not about "permissions" for others to use or not to use the libraries. I think everything was on the list. Sasha _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
