Good point. Thanks for bringing it up and we can discuss it at the next EWG meeting.
woody -----Original Message----- From: John Russo [mailto:john.ru...@qlogic.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:45 PM To: Woodruff, Robert J; gene...@lists.openfabrics.org Cc: ewg@lists.openfabrics.org Subject: RE: RHEL 5.3 and OFED 1.4.x I understand but I think that this is another consideration that should be factored in. Even if there are no "critical" PRs to fix, the introduction of RHEL 5.3 (along with less critical PRs) may be enough justification. I simply want to plant the seed in everyone's mind before our next meeting. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Woodruff, Robert J [mailto:robert.j.woodr...@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:44 PM To: John Russo; gene...@lists.openfabrics.org Cc: ewg@lists.openfabrics.org Subject: RE: RHEL 5.3 and OFED 1.4.x In the last EWG meeting, we discussed waiting a month or so and seeing what kind of bugs were reported against 1.4 to determine if a 1.4.1 release was needed. ________________________________ From: general-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:general-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of John Russo Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:37 PM To: gene...@lists.openfabrics.org Subject: [ofa-general] RHEL 5.3 and OFED 1.4.x Does the release of RHEL 5.3 create any additional justification for a maintenance release of OFED (1.4.1) to be generated? I am already hearing requests for an OFED release that will support it. John Russo QLogic _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg