I have encountered many customers whose clusters are purposely not on the internet and hence could not perform a download.
It would be best if the FW was included in the release. I think there is precedence with other Linux drivers which have included binary images of ASIC FW without having to release the source code. Todd Rimmer Chief Architect QLogic Network Systems Group Voice: 610-233-4852 Fax: 610-233-4777 todd.rim...@qlogic.com www.QLogic.com > -----Original Message----- > From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:ewg- > boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of John Russo > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 1:19 PM > To: Woodruff, Robert J; Steve Wise; tzipo...@dev.mellanox.co.il > Cc: OpenFabrics EWG > Subject: RE: [ewg] shipping firmware with ofed > > How about something along the lines of a firmware update tool built into > OFED that checks the HCA for the proper firmware and gives the user to > download the current version. It could automatically pull from Mellanox's > site and therefore avoid the licensing issue while still providing a > customer service. > > -----Original Message----- > From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org [mailto:ewg- > boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Robert J > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 1:17 PM > To: Steve Wise; tzipo...@dev.mellanox.co.il > Cc: OpenFabrics EWG > Subject: RE: [ewg] shipping firmware with ofed > > Steve Wrote, > > >I request that we do add this. Forcing customers to download firmware > >isn't very user friendly. > > >It should be fairly easy to do, yes? I would take on the work involved > >to add the infrastructure needed... > > >All that would be needed, I think, is to make a src rpm that allows > >generating an rpm that will install the firmware in /lib/firmware. Each > >provider could manage their own. Or we could have a "firmware" src rpm > >that holds all the providers' firmware images... > > >Thoughts? > > >Steve. > > > If people submit firmware to ofed, then would it have to be submitted > under the dual BSD/GPL license as agreed to in the OFA bylaws. If so, > then you would probably have to submit the firmware source code as well, > and I am not sure if you are willing to do that... > > woody > _______________________________________________ > ewg mailing list > ewg@lists.openfabrics.org > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg > _______________________________________________ > ewg mailing list > ewg@lists.openfabrics.org > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg