All addressing code now resides within a rdmaoe-specific flow in the cma, so the changes do not seem invasive. Is there any specific change that concerns you?
http://www.t11.org/ftp/t11/pub/fc/study/09-543v0.pdf describes the IBTA definition in progress, which is in line with the current driver stack implementation. --Liran -----Original Message----- From: Roland Dreier [mailto:rdre...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 9:20 PM To: Liran Liss Cc: Richard Frank; o...@lists.openfabrics.org; OpenFabrics EWG Subject: Re: [ewg] Re: [ofw] SC'09 BOF - Meeting notes > In any case, this is not a correctness issue that prohibits > experimentation with rdmaoe multicast on any network today. I agree -- nothing prevents experimentation. I am just leery about making invasive changes to the core stack in the absence of any documented design for IBoE (that I've seen at least). - R. _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg