> + u8 mac_0_1[2]; > + u8 mac_2_5[4];
This looks a bit odd. Any reason why you don't just have "u8 mac[6];" in this structure? -- Roland Dreier <rola...@cisco.com> || For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
