I tested it before on the Roland tree ( iboe branch ) and it fails, because it writen in the way suitable for OFED. If adapt the patch to the Roland tree, then appling Mellanox OFED patches will fail, because it changes the same functions in the code. Here is one example: Look at __mlx4_ib_modify_qp at the Roland tree - there is no RAW_ETY support. But in the OFED version of the same function this support is present. RAW_ETH patch modify this function and looking for RAW_ETY word and without this RAW_ETH Mellanox patch will fail.
The similar thing happens with patch for the verbs. There is no iWARP present in the Roland tree. On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 13:50 +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > I don't think there is a substantial dependence between RoCEE and raw > ethernet. I don't know what Moni meant. Moni? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:ogerl...@voltaire.com] > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 1:42 PM > To: Moni Shoua; Eli Cohen > Cc: Aleksey Senin; Vladimir Sokolovsky; v...@dev.mellanox.co.il; > e...@openfabrics.org > Subject: Re: [ewg] [PATCH v4] IB Core: RAW ETH support > > Moni Shoua wrote: > > The patches can't be applies to upstream kernel. An attempt to do this > > failed. I guess that some of RoCEE patches are still missing in kernel > > upstream. > Eli, can you elaborate on that? is there any real dependence between the RoCE > patches to the raw qp ones? what is this dependence in high level, is it > placement of change sets in the code or actual flows? > > Or. _______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
