If this helps, it is from 3/21 … to my knowledge the most recent summary sent 
by Doug Ledford.

Updates from version 12:

        • Minor improvements to qedr provider
        • Add libpvrdma provider for VMWare rdma virt devices
        • Improved RoCE AH creation
        • Packet Pacing support
        • Various github build system improvements
        • Updates to Debian and Red Hat packaging
        • Timestamp support in mlx4 provider
        • Make the libibverbs/provider interface private
        • Clean up headers for improved multi-arch support
        • Add Verbs Direct support for mlx5 provider
        • Implement new, more specific multi-arch barrier methods
        • Update all providers to the modern registration method and remove
ibv_register_driver entirely
        • Switch the code to use gcc endian conversion functions
        • Fix an endianness issue in srp_daemon
        • Implement a new release mechanism that should create more distro
friendly tarballs based on the common release tagging format
        • Updates to make it possible to run sparse on rdma-core
        • Fixes found by running sparse on rdma-core
        • Fixes to travis tarball upload script
        • Fix to broken cmake test


> On Apr 6, 2017, at 12:31 PM, Adit Ranadive <ad...@vmware.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:22:26PM +0000, Davis, Arlin R wrote:
>> We need to finalize the changes going into RC2. Can I get some feedback 
>> regarding moving to rdma-core v13 or staying with v12? Moving to rdma-core 
>> v13 would make vmw_pvrdma inclusion easier but would require VMware to pull 
>> back their changes pushed into RC1.
>> 
>> Comments?
>> 
> 
> I'm not opposed to rolling back the RC1 changes for vmw_pvrdma. There are
> fairly trivial. However, you would have find out the various differences
> between rdma-core-12 and 13, f.e. bug fixes, functionality changes, etc.
> and how those impact the existing providers.
> 
> The other thing I wanted to point out was regarding the Qlogic provider -
> rdma-core-12 added them as a user space provider but there isnt a kernel 
> driver in OFED 4.8. I believe they were added as a provider in 4.9 kernel.
> Not sure, if that is an issue for you guys.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adit
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ewg mailing list
> ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ewg

==================================================
Susan Coulter / HPC-DES
Network Capability Lead
(505) 667-8425
“Once in a while you get shown the light
    In the strangest of places if you look at it right”  Robert Hunter
==================================================







_______________________________________________
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ewg

Reply via email to