After a day spent without email due to a corrupted database, we're making changes to our Exchange 2003 setup. At the moment, we have a Compaq DL380, dual P3 866 with 2 gigs of RAM. There are four drive slots, with 4 36 gig drives, all set up together as a RAID 5 with a hot spare (72 total space). We have about 100 users (very heavy email usage), and are running a SharePoint portal site on the server as well. The system is heavily IO bound at the moment, so I need to do a drive reconfiguration. We're a non-profit, so I'm trying to keep hardware costs low.
For Exchange 2003, do you think it would be better to have 1) Two RAID1 arrays, one for OS + Exchange + database files, and one for swapfile + log files 2) One RAID1 array with a hot spare for OS + Exchange + swapfile + log, and an external RAID5 array for database files 3) Same as #2, but with a RAID5 array instead of RAID1 4) Something else? For SharePoint, I'm thinking that a external RAID5 array would do the job, as the SQL Server backing SharePoint is what is causing the most problem. I'm trying to get the best uptime, followed by the best performance. Thanks for any help, Erick _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
