Nested DL's can sometimes act funny when used to permission a PF. User grants Accounting Users DL editor permission. Accounting Users DL is set to a Security Group. The Accounting DL is made up of Accounting Users Corp and Accounting Users Europe. Since those DL's aren't directly used to secure permissions, they may not convert to a security group.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey (Citco) Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: removing 5.5 server from org Also sometimes when PF permissions are granted to DLs. Exchange 2003 converts them on the fly to mail-enabled security groups as soon as one of the DL members attempts to access the PF. I have seen cases where PF access was still messed up for 1-2 weeks after this and then magically started working fine. Another trick - if users have certain PFs in their Favorites since Exchange 5.5 days, PF access may be messed up after migration. Have the users remove the PFs from the Favorites and them readd them. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aristotle Zoulas Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: removing 5.5 server from org Follow-up question regarding our migration. We managed to get the 5.5 server removed from the Org and we are operating in 100% native mode (2003) The problem we are having now is that our Public Folders are "all messed up." What I mean is that the permissions are nothing what they used to be on the 5.5 server. People that had permission to something now do not. This included public calendars, etc.. Is this something the ADC (Active Directory Connector) is responsible for. Any idea what caused this and more important, how to fix it. TIA -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: removing 5.5 server from org You can load the Exchange 5.5 Administrator on a workstation. I wouldn't put it on the Exchange 2003 server at this point, but I don't know of any reason you shouldn't, since it's one of the setup options of Exchange 2003. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aristotle Zoulas Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: removing 5.5 server from org ________________________________ Hello, we added a 2003 Exchange server to your org (we are upgrading) , got everything (public/private info) moved over. We are now trying to remove the 5.5 server and we are having some problems. Per the MS docs, we tried to remove it from the 5.5 administrator. It got it removed about 75% and then crapped out. Now when we reboot the 5.5 server a bunch of Exchange services don't start. The error was that some public folders were not successfuly moved over. We thought they were as replication was up to date. Would it help (or hurt) to load the 5.5 admin console on the 2003 Exchange server (is this possible). IS there any best way to remove the 5.5 server at this point? TIA _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
