Well, yes. But his language suggested he was looking for something, not wanting to create strife and discord.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Richard Stovall <rich...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think you're assuming he's not trolling... > > :) > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Jonathan Link <jonathan.l...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Well, I think you're trawling, not trolling... :D >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Adam Farage <afar...@outlook.com> wrote: >> >>> Completely understood :) I will troll through the Technet forums to see >>> if I can get some inkling of what it could be. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> From: mich...@smithcons.com >>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com >>> Subject: RE: [Exchange] Just so you know.... >>> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:16:09 +0000 >>> >>> >>> At this point they are considered NDA. Since multiple TAPs are >>> reporting it, it's a good bet I'll be able to say something soon. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: >>> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Farage >>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 27, 2014 2:10 PM >>> *To:* exchange@lists.myitforum.com >>> *Subject:* RE: [Exchange] Just so you know.... >>> >>> >>> >>> Care to share, or are they NDA? >>> >>> I haven't deployed 2013 for a large (10,000+ users) yet, but I do have >>> one coming up in a few weeks... >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> From: mich...@smithcons.com >>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com >>> >>> Subject: [Exchange] Just so you know.... >>> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:02:47 +0000 >>> >>> There are a couple of important issues bubbling up from Exchange 2013 >>> SP1.... I'm running it in prod, but you may want to hold off a week or two >>> until we see how those play out... >>> >> >> >
