Yes, use two hosts so you can cluster. On Sep 4, 2014 6:31 PM, "Richard Stovall" <rich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> GIven the hardware you describe later in the thread, and some assumptions > about the small size of your environment, I bet you can pretty much do > whatever you want with the VMs. You probably don't even need two hosts for > anything besides uptime reasons. > > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Joseph Schvarcz <yossi...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I’m looking to setup 2 HyperV hosts and several servers on them. >> >> I’m looking at: >> >> 1- File server >> >> 2- SQL server, 2 of them >> >> 3- 2 domain controllers >> >> 4- Terminal server >> >> >> >> I am thinking to split the SQL servers and maybe 1 domain controller on 1 >> host and the rest on the other. >> >> I wanted to get some feedback on how to setup the VHD’s? I know 2012R2 >> has VHDX now, where I am stuck is what kind to create? >> >> There is fixed and dynamic, do I want to use dynamic for the OS >> partition, then fixed for data? or can I use dynamic everywhere except for >> the SQL data volumes? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> > >
