After MSFT release OneNote, very little attention was paid to Notes in Exchange.
I’ve never seen this before, but I’ve posed your question to the MVP community at large to see if anyone has a comment. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Puchalski, Mark A. Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 7:50 AM To: exchange@lists.myITforum.com Subject: [Exchange] Exchange 2013 & MRM 2.0 / Message Retention after upgrade At the beginning of the year, we migrated from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2013. In 2007, we were using managed folder mailbox policies to implement a retention policy for all users. Basically, we purged email from all folders after 90 days from receipt. Trash was purged after 30 days. We had policies in place for Calendar, Notes and Tasks that we would not purge them. Using MRM 2.0 and retention tags, we setup the same policy structure in 2013. The default policy tag (DPT) is set at the 90 day purge. Trash is set at 30 days, and we have policies set for Calendar, Notes and Tasks with ‘unlimited’ retention period. We also added the necessary registry settings to prevent calendar items from purging. We found in pilot that when we applied the policies to a mailbox, it started to purge notes. Since most notes were created years ago, they started disappearing right away. We spent many hours troubleshooting with MS and it was noted that at first the Notes retention tag was applying, but then the DPT was applied, and that caused the notes to purge. If we created a new Note in 2013, it got the correct retention tag, and was not set to purge. This was all viewable through MFCMAPI. In the end, we had to manually modify all notes for all users to get the proper tag to apply after conversion to 2013, and then could apply the retention policies. Has anyone else had this problem with a 2007 to 2013 conversion? I am aware of 1 other company that had this issue in a 2013 conversion. MS has eaten up over 120 hours on our EA support contract, so we are looking at a hefty bill. Initially, they were indicating that it looked like a bug, and we’d get our hours refunded. However, now they’re saying they can’t repro in their lab. They did hours of traces, but apparently those don’t provide any useful information. They wanted to try in our environment, but we had to decommission the 2007 servers prior to EOL in March of this year. Basically, I’m looking for any additional information I can find (e.g. MS ticket numbers from others who have had this problem) that will assist in pushing for a bug designation, or at the very least, some significant relief in hours that were spent in troubleshooting. Thanks. This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender of the error.