Sorry - just tried that search mechanism and it is completely useless so
apologies for wasting your time!
Here's the complete thread so start from the bottom and work up to see if
anything is relevant.
=======================
"Thanks, that was the right tip:
If I clear "This is a Primary Connection Agreement for the connected Windows
Domain" they only get mail-enabled. Exactly what I want.
By the way, another cool feature of the ADC concerning contact -
replication:
Exchange 5.5
Exchange Recipient - Container
-- Contacts1 - Container
---- Contacts1 - Container
-- Contacts2 - Container
---- Contacts22 - Container
Now, if you map the ADC to Exchange Recipient - Container (MX 5.5) and on
the other side to one OU in ADS, then the ADC will AUTOMATICALLY create the
necessary OUs (Contacts1,Contacts11, and so
on) for you. Cool .-)
Greetings,
Thomas
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory Connector - Question
Using the ADC to mail-enable existing objects is not something
I've done in
practice since we used the ADC to actually create objects.
However if you
are confident that the matching rules will actually match up the right
objects (by default, they are matched by GUID, legacyExchange DN, and
primary Windows NT account), then you might want to consider initially
setting up the Connection Agreement as secondary since this
should prevent
the creation of lots of duplicates if the matches don't work.
See <http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/en/60/exhelp/default.asp?URL=
/exchange/en
/60/exhelp/ADC_Htm/adc02P_SetaDefaultPolicytoCustObjectMatchingR
ules.htm>
However you should still only need the one Connection Agreement
since you
are not trying to actually create objects in two disparate OUs; you are
effectively just modifying existing objects with some extra mail-related
attributes, therefore the one agreement will "find" the
matching objects and
be able to write changes to them as long as they are in the same domain.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Kofler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 May 2001 17:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: AW: Active Directory Connector - Question
postscript:
The user accounts are already in the OU1 and OU2, they only need be
mail-enabled through ADC.
.................
Right, if I understand it right I can do the following:
Exhange 5.5, 1 one Recipient database
then map this database to ou1 and with a second connection
agreement map the
same exchange 5.5 database to the second ou (ou2). (The two ous are the
summary of all users in the 5.5 database)
So all users in the two OUs will get mail-enabled,
am I right ?
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Mark Harford
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Mai 2001 18:14
An: Exchange Discussions
Betreff: RE: Active Directory Connector - Question
Fair enough, but you're getting complicated there since he only
appears to
have one 55 user container. To get the ADC to split the creation of new
objects between sub-OUs he'd need to do some manual editing of the
Connection Agreements search filters via LDP or ADSIEdit.
I was referring to the fact that the one CA would be able to
carry across
modifications and/or deletions of a user to a destination other than the
default target OU (as opposed to user account creations which would
obviously be in the default OU1).
rgrds
mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 May 2001 15:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory Connector - Question
...unless you're going to keep adding users to the 5.5 side and
expect them
to show up in the correct OU.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 4:34 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Active Directory Connector - Question
>
>
> If they are initially replicated into OU1 and then manually moved into
> the sub-OUs, the same CA will find them as long as those sub-OUs are
> in the same domain, so no, you should NOT need additional CAs.
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 25 May 2001 00:38
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Active Directory Connector - Question
>
>
> Thomas,
> you can indicate more than one source OU, but of course only one
> target container per CA.
>
> creating additional CAs is not difficult, though - and they are "free
> with your paid subscription". so crunch all you want - you can make
> more. :)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Kofler
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:00 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Active Directory Connector - Question
>
>
> We are planning our adc - connector.
>
> We have one Exchange 5.5 - Recipients - Container which must be
> synchronized with two OUs in the ADS.
>
> The OUs are placed like this:
>
> Site1
> -OU1
> --- subOU11
> --- subOU12
>
> When configure the ads - connector is it right I have to do the
> folling: Exchange 5.5 - Container on the one end of the replication
> and the container OU1 on the other end of the replication
>
> The Exchange 5.5 - Users are split into 2 OUs in the ADS. Will the ADC
> look into the sub-OUs or will I have to create more Connection
> Agreements ?
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received
it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose
the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of
this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the
BBC, unless specifically stated.
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
