Circular logging is probably appropriate for connector-only, and maybe for
public folder servers where instances are maintained on other backed-up
servers.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
All your base are belong to us.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Benjamin Scott
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Very small servers (was: A good space for the Exchange ...)
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Linton Smith (WBTQ) wrote:
> Consider this - You have some sort of hardware problem that corrupts the
> database. You learn about it because your backup fails one night. If
> Circular Logging is not enabled, you can easily recover from this by
> restoring your last good backup and allowing the logs to replay.
Hmmmmmm.... that is a good point. The assumption was that any failure
that required restoring from tape would have destroyed the logs as well --
i.e., something like a complete disk failure. A failure such as you
describe is perhaps not very likely, but certainly possible.
I will move to have circular logging disabled on any Exchange system we
maintain.
Thanks for the advice!
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not
|
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or
|
| organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind.
|
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
