Not entirely true. That was an old version that munged stuff that way. Our P*x* d*n* d* *hat t** o*t*n, *u* h*ve *o** oth*r i*su*s.
Seriously, the newer code bases are the ones that cause dupes, because they selectively drop packets that have ESMTP commands in them. ------------------------------------------------------ Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:52 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: host unreachable > > > You'll be able to identify the Cisco mailguard feature because it > filters everything except 2 and 0, and replaces it with an > asterisk. So > your telnet session will be answered by > ******22*********0******2****0*************** > > And it's not an extension of SMTP; it's a forced limitation of it. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Siegel, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Posted At: Thursday, November 01, 2001 01:06 PM > > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > > Conversation: host unreachable > > Subject: host unreachable > > > > > > > > The question [I'll ask first] is why would mail to this > > specific domain not > > work? All other hosts work. And intellocity claims that > they have no > > problems from any other mail servers. > > now the info: > > > > I am having a mildy intermittent mail delivery problem, and > > for the most > > part it is non-working vs working.Errors that were discovered > > linking to > > Intellocity are as follows: > > > > Upon setting Maximum SMTP logging in Exchange 5.5 [I am at actv.com] > > - Event 3010 is being recorded in app event log > > -Event 2003 is also being recorded app event log > > > > 3010:An attempt to connect to host intellocity.com failed. > > > > Event ID 3010 can be caused by the any of the following scenarios: > > There is a name resolution issue to the relay host. > > There are limitations of the relay host, such as inbound > > connections are > > allowed. > > There is a firewall issue. > > To continue troubleshooting, run Telnet to determine if the > > IP address that > > is listed in the event is correct. Next, verify that the IP > > address has a > > functioning SMTP port. > > > > > > Event 2003: > > A new TCP/IP SMTP connection has been made to host > 64.139.16.228 (for > > intellocity.com). Logfile: L0000004.LOG > > According to technet: > > If an event ID 2003 is reported, a connection has been made > > to that relay > > host. If you are experiencing event 2003 in addition to the > > other events, > > you may need to troubleshoot this issue as an intermittent > > issue. This event > > can occur if the maximum number of inbound connections to the > > relay host has > > been reached. > > > > I wanted to see where it was actually breaking down- So I > > went into the raw > > SMTP log files and excerpted the following: > > > > 9/7/2001 2:53:20 PM : <<< IO: |250 OK - Recipient > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > | > > 9/7/2001 2:53:20 PM : <<< 250 OK - Recipient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 9/7/2001 2:53:20 PM : >>> DATA > > > > 9/7/2001 2:53:20 PM : <<< IO: |354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF > > | > > 9/7/2001 2:53:20 PM : <<< 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF > > 9/7/2001 2:55:03 PM : 499 Host unreachable: > intellocity.com. Message > > subject: ""RE: Stock Options"". Rescheduling delivery for later. > > > > > > A technet lookup at this 499 error indicates: > > A 499 Error: "No routing hosts are reachable," indicates > that the TCP > > connection has been dropped. > > My guess-obviously I am not a network engineer, is they are > > running some > > extended smtp set, like the cisco smtp fixup protocol or some > > outside factor > > is disconnecting them.? > > > > Please help. I tried to furnish as much info as I could. > > > > > > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Fogarty, David > > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 5:07 PM > > To: Mitchell, Gary; Siegel, Richard; @Unix Team > > Subject: Email to Intellocity... > > > > We should document several tests to have on hand when we > > inevitably get > > asked what we've done about the situation.... An email to > > Derik with the > > tests we've done and the results we obtained would be wise as well. > > > > I don't want to say "It's not us" though until we're 100% > > positive..... > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]