Ah - there's an advantage to the script. Using the Outlook UI method you have to address the resource as a "Resource". If you do it as an "Attendee" (optional or required) it won't auto accept the request.
Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:48 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such... > > > Mr. Strong's script has no such limitation on how you address > the resources. Optional, required, resource, whatever - it > all works a treat. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:39 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such... > > > Yep... that the Q article that I had seen this past weekend. > > Thanks a bunch for everyone's help, I really appreciate it. > > I still have a couple of questions, so I hope I'm not > drumming on a subject that's been talked to death here. > > I've gone ahead and set the default permissions to None, as > suggested. Of course with that set as such, when selecting > "Attendees and Resources" while creating a meeting request, > they cannot drop a conference room in to the resource. When > they try a dialog box appears stating they do not have the > proper permissions to do so and that they must use the > "Required" or "Optional" boxes. > > The problem here though is that using anything other then the > "Resource" box for the conference room will not fire the > auto-accept response. It will just sit there in the > conference room's inbox. > > My question is... is it a safe assumption that to get this > to work with only "Required" or "Optional" that I would need > Robert Strong's AutoAccept script form ExchangeCode? i.e. -- > I cannot use the resource booking script from Outlook2000. > > Thanks again for your time. > > -KHD > > -- > Kevin H. Devin > IT Systems Administrator > Alerton Technologies, Inc. > Redmond, WA > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:40 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such... > > > See also Q246866 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 7:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such... > > > Yes, Lori Hunter must have the day off or she would be right > in here :) > > {Playing the part of Lori Hunter in tonight's performance > will be Ken Powell} > > In short, DON'T ALLOW DIRECT BOOKING IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE > THE AUTOACCEPT SCRIPT!!!! Allow ONLY Reviewer access if they > need to get into the calendar. If they complain, tell them > that they can not have it both ways and to stop whining. > > {How did I do Lori?} > > I just got finished fighting this last week. This has been > discussed at quite some length in the last couple of weeks. A > search on "auto accept" should lead you to it. > > The following TechNet articles will show you what I needed to > do to correct it. Q281935 and Q289606. > > Ken Powell > Systems Administrator > Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) > Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:38 PM > To: Exchange 5.5 List > Subject: Conference Rooms and such... > > This past weekend I stumbled across a piece of information > that stated that users should not be allowed to view a > resources calendar by doing a "File / Open / Other User's > Folder" as it could break the auto-acceptance and cause > corruption. This bit of info also included steps to prevent > this from happening while leaving the remaining functionality intact. > > The problem is... I can't remember where I seen this info. > I have gone through the FAQ, the archives, and TechNet, but > am unable to re-locate this info. Would anyone have a clue > as to what I'm referring to and point me in the right > direction? I would greatly appreciate it. > > -KHD > > -- > Kevin H. Devin > IT Systems Administrator > Alerton Technologies, Inc. > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
