You're assuming that the Eseutil didn't chew up some of the database.

-- Drew
********************************
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
Only the dead have seen the last of war. - Plato

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Yanek Korff
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing


Alas, I don't know.  Seeing as 3.5 G were cleared, can I assume there were
3.5 gigs of whitespace?  Adding a drive isn't so easy as the system's
already full up on drives.

-Yanek.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
> 
> 
> How much white space was there before the defrag?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
> 
> 
> He did wait an hour...  And he's confident the copy was 
> complete - same
> byte count on both the network drive and the local drive.
> 
> -Yanek.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:42 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
> > 
> > 
> > Sounds like he got impatient and didn't wait for the database
> > to finish
> > being copied back to exchsrvr\mdbdata from the network share 
> > - which needs
> > to complete before you get your dos prompt back.
> > 
> > After he killed ESEutil, he could've also copied it back 
> manually and 
> > renamed back to priv.edb instead of tape restore.  Then, the defrag 
> > effort would not have been in vain.
> > 
> > Louise
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:27 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
> > 
> > He followed the KB article, whatever it was.  Services were
> > down.  I think
> > he followed all the "right" procedures.  The temp file was on 
> > a network
> > drive that had plenty of room.  The defragged temp database 
> > exists on the
> > temp drive and is whole.  That's how he figures it freed 3.5 gigs.
> > 
> > -Yanek.
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:26 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The utility is dangerous in the wrong hands.  It can take a
> > > very, very, very
> > > long time to run.  It also gets very snitty when you don't 
> > > have enough room
> > > on the HD (or network share) to create the temp file that is 
> > > part of the
> > > defrag process....Where did he attempt to create the temp 
> > > file....on the
> > > same drive that is almost full?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > And how is he enjoying his time at home these days?
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:16 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: disaster debriefing
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Ok, so we had a disaster the other day.  Co-Worker of mine
> > ran eseutil
> > > against the private IS to free up some disk space.  We were
> > > at about 95%
> > > capacity on the drive, and it would creep up to about 98% 
> > > before the nightly
> > > incrementals, which brought it back down.  Now, I'm not 
> > positive what
> > > command he ran, but apparently it cleared about 3.5 gigs out
> > > of the IS.
> > > Right before eseutil exited, however, it apparently "hung" 
> > > waiting for a
> > > command prompt.
> > > 
> > > I'm a little fuzzy as to what happened after this.  I think
> > > he tried to
> > > reboot, and then the IS didn't come up -- he got some errors, 
> > > looked them up
> > > in the KB to very little avail.  So when I got in at 9 the 
> > > next morning,
> > > mail was down.  He was still there.
> > > 
> > > We managed to put humpty dumpty back together again restoring
> > > from the full
> > > backup we made right before starting this procedure.  It 
> > took several
> > > attempts - he had tried restoring from backup before but
> > > hadn't had any
> > > success.  I think the procedure we followed was this:
> > > Shut down all exchange services
> > > Start System Attendant & directory service
> > > Restore DS
> > > Stop System Attendant & directory service
> > > Restart System Attendant
> > > Restore IS
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Any other combination of services running/not running
> > didn't work out.
> > > We're using Veritas Backup Exec BTW.  Well everything's back
> > > to the way it
> > > was before we started this whole mess.  I know I've seen 
> > > discussions about
> > > eseutil on this list before, but I wanted to revisit this 
> > and get some
> > > concrete information.
> > > 
> > > What did we do wrong?  What's the right way to use eseutil to
> > > gain disk
> > > space?  I'd appreciate any non-flaming advice, pointers, 
> > > docs, etc.  I find
> > > the archives non-intuitive -- or maybe I'm looking in the 
> > wrong place?
> > > Can't seem to find a good place to type in a search phrase
> > > "eseutil" and
> > > have it return relevant data (I'm here: http://www.swynk.com)
> > > 
> > > -Yanek.
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to