Actually, I have been having the same problem here - with our VP. We have actually checked in his Outlook for any delegates, and there are none. There are absolutely no references at all to this former employee. Yet, whenever a calendar request is sent to this VP the sender gets an NDR back, just like is mentioned in here. The only other thing that we could think of was to delete the mailbox and recreate it (which we haven't done yet). If anybody else has any better ideas, please let us know. Looks like there are lots of us with this problem . . .
James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR for Calender meeting You won't find it on the Delegates tab in Exchange Administrator. The *real* recipient still has the former employee defined as a delegate in Outlook. The user (AKA *real* recipient) must remove it. -----Original Message----- From: Berquam, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR for Calender meeting I'm actually having this exact problem. The NDR is for the former employee. I have gone into the delegates section and removed the name, but the error is still there. Any suggestions on how to get rid of this 'phantom' delegate entry? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NDR for Calender meeting Destination user may have a delegate specified who is no longer with the company. -----Original Message----- From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDR for Calender meeting Brothers en Sisters, Env. Exchange 5.5 sp 4, Outlook 98, Problem: When users try to make an appointment via Calander they get an NDR but the destination user recieves the invitation. An a few seconds later the sender recieves a delivered message also. It is only for 5 recepients. Has someone an idea about this problem? gr m _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
