It went like this: Me - telnet 194.154.211.74 25 (20 -30 second wait - maybe they should look at Q286375...) Them - 220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5.2653.13) ready Me - HELO mail.arendt-medernach.lu Them - 250 OK Me - MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Them - 250 OK MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Me - RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Them - 250 OK Recipient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Me - DATA Them - 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF Me - Subject: test (enter enter) Me - Test message...blah,blah,blah (enter . enter) Them - 250 OK Me - QUIT Them - 221 closing connection
So far no reply and no bounce either. My internet mail connector does not have the "Send HELO instead of EHLO" checked. So below is the script if I use EHLO. 220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5. 2653.13) ready 250-XCHGSERVER.NTDOM Hello [TEAM_MAIL] 250-XEXCH50 250-HELP 250-ETRN 250-DSN 250-SIZE 5242880 250-AUTH LOGIN 250 AUTH=LOGIN 250 OK - mail from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 250 OK - Recipient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF 250 OK QUIT 221 closing connection I am using Exchange 2000 SP2. Do most people send EHLO? Do most people have SMTP connectors set up to not send etrn/turn? Hell, maybe I should get rid of my SMTP connector and just let the default smtp virtual server handle everything. Thoughts and suggestions welcomed. Tim Hooks -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR You tried to send it to "Joe Schmoe"? Did you use HELO or EHLO? Please post the transcript of your manual session. -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com> The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley> Tiggercam: <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk> --------------------------------------------------------- No Matter how Great and Destructive your Problems May Seem Now, Remember, You've Probably only Seen the Tip of Them --------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR The manual SMTP session seemed to work fine. No reply yet, but no errors either. The other end is and Exchange 5.5 box: 220 XCHGSERVER.NTDOM ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5.2653.13) ready It seemed pretty slow to establish the initial connection, maybe 30 seconds. Any other ideas? I want to make sure it is not a setting on my end before I call to hassle them. Thanks. Tim Hooks -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5.0 DNR what happens when you do a manual SMTP session with their server? Q153119 -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com> The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley> Tiggercam: <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk> --------------------------------------------------------- "Smoking Kills. If you're killed, you've lost a very important part of your life." - Brooke Shields, during an interview to become spokesperson for a federal anti-smoking campaign --------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5.0 DNR I am getting the message below back from an email server in Luxembourg after about 5 minutes. I am sending from Exchange 2000, SP2. I am able to communicate with this address from a hotmail account. Perhaps unrelated, but I noticed their website seems to be a Netscape server. Our internet mail connector sends ehlo does not send etrn/turn. Any ideas? Thanks for your help. Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE KBHR 65 E. State Street, Suite 1800 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: RE: Test Sent: 1/16/2002 8:16 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: 'Joe Schmoe' on 1/16/2002 8:21 AM There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator. <aries.inside.kbhr.com #5.5.0> _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
