The mailboxes that show 0 items have 0 items. They are empty admin
mailboxes.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange behavior


I had a similar situation.  Two users had mailboxes that had over a million
items in it and the mailbox resources view of total k and # of items always
indicated 0.  You need to look at the mailboxes for the two users that show
0 items.  

Dot

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnold, Paul [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:07 AM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:      Strange behavior
> 
> Hi All.
> 
> I have a strange problem. My exchange server is running pretty slow. 
> We are running Exchange 5.5, sp4. The priv.mdb is 58 GB, and has 
> slowly climbed to that size, but performance SUDDENLY went to a crawl 
> this morning. There are no strange (or error) events in the event log, 
> SMTP connections are still working in/out and CPU & memory usage are 
> generally low. Traffic on the switch is low as well.
> 
> (BTW: I know there is a 60GB threshold that we are dangerously close 
> to, but a new 2000 clustered Exchange server will be in place within 6 
> weeks.)
> 
> I don't expect a list thread of "did you check.." (but I'd welcome it) 
> but here is something strange: When I look at the list of mailboxes in 
> Exch Admin on the server and sort by
> size, 4 mailboxes (each is quite large) get sorted above the empty
> mailboxes.
> So my sort looks like this:
> Mailbox       Total K Total items
> User1         2,227,430       21,129
> User2         2,535,232       18,538
> User3         3,344,777       32,785
> User4         3,444,626       57,871
> User5         0               0
> User6         0               0
> User7         1               1
> ...etc
> 
> The bottom of the list looks normal enough...a few mailboxes some even 
> near the same size.
> 
> Has anyone experienced similar phenomena? I think I have noticed this 
> in the past, and it may not be related to the performance, but it was 
> bugging me.
> 
> My suggestion was to clean up those mailboxes, export the content, 
> then blow them away and recreate them.
> 
> Thanks
> Paul
>  
> LEGAL NOTICE - Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is 
> confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the 
> addressee(s) only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is 
> unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying 
> of the contents or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it 
> is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you
> are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
LEGAL NOTICE - Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is
confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s)
only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not
an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents or any action taken
(or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you
are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to