Thanks, sorry for all the repeats. Andrew
-----Original Message----- From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2k & Clustering Active/Active Don't do Active/Active, do Active/Passive and everybody's happy. If Active/Passive slows down user response too much, then Active/Active is pretty well guaranteed to fail. Read SP2 Release Notes -----Original Message----- From: Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:34 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: E2k & Clustering Active/Active Subject: E2k & Clustering Active/Active We are evaluating an Exchange 2000 Active/Active cluster, but I remember a limitation of 1000 clients per virtual server. In my searching of technet, and other knowledgebase solutions, I have not been able to find this documented anywhere. Is there a technical limit to the number of clients per virtual server? Proposed hardware: 2 quad processor, 2GB systems connected to SAN via fibre channel. 100MB NIC connections. Roughly 4k users. Searching the archives now... Thanks, Andrew _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
