Most of that opinion is experience based, Ed is a published Author with
an exchange Book under his belt, He knows what he is talking about. If
you ask any MVP, any one who has worked with exchange they too will all
say Active / passive is the better of the 2.

Personally I prefer to listen to Mr. Crowley "the only good cluster is a
single node" Meaning there is no good cluster


--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Etts, Russell
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 6:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2k Clustering


Hi there

I was looking over the white paper, and according to Microsoft, both
active/passive and active/active are recommended in the below listed
whitepaper.  Do you have access to information that suggests otherwise??

Thanks

Russell

-----Original Message-----
From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2k Clustering


Make it Active/Passive as recommended and it's a moot point.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:42 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: E2k Clustering
Subject: RE: E2k Clustering


When they talk about concurrent connections, does microsoft mean if one
users is using a mapi client that would mean 3 connections there for
just one user.  Is this correct?

Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania


-----Original Message-----
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2k Clustering


Hi there

According to the MS whitepaper, here are the limits for active / active:

"After you deploy your cluster, make sure you do the following:

Limit the number of concurrent connection (users) per node to a maximum
of 1,900, and proactively monitor the cluster to insure that the CPU
does not exceed 40 percent (load generated from users) loading."

There is more information in the white paper that will help you.  The
name is, "Deploying Microsoft Exchange 2000 server service pack 2
clusters". 

Hope this helps you

Russell


 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ashby, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2k Clustering


We are evaluating an Exchange 2000 Active/Active cluster, but I remember
an old limitation of 1000 clients per virtual server.

In my searching of technet, and other knowledgebase solutions, I have
not been able to find this documented anywhere.

Is there a technical limit to the number of clients per virtual server?

Proposed hardware:  2 quad processor, 2GB systems connected to SAN via
fibre channel.  100MB NIC connections.

Roughly 4k users.

Thanks,

Andrew

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to